There is suffering by many animals that are attractive to the fur industry. The loss of habitat is as cruel but usually with less drama look at the video in the below photo shared with us by former CBC writer Mark Rennie Forsyth. It is less drama then seeing the results when an animal ches his foot off to escape this crule bite.

Trap,👀 lynx 👀

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Cruel fate averted

The use of leg-hold traps on fur-bearing animals has been a subject of significant controversy and ethical concern. These traps are designed to capture animals by gripping their legs, leading to injury, pain, and distress. The suffering caused by such traps has sparked debates around the world, leading to increased scrutiny and calls for more humane alternatives.

Many organizations and individuals advocate for the prohibition or strict regulation of leg-hold traps, emphasizing the need to prioritize animal welfare and minimize unnecessary suffering in the fur industry. Efforts to raise awareness about the impact of these traps and promote ethical treatment of animals continue to be essential in addressing this issue.

It is important to explore and support sustainable and ethical alternatives to fur production, ensuring the well-being of animals and the preservation of natural habitats. The ongoing dialogue about the use of leg-hold traps reflects the broader ethical considerations surrounding human interaction with wildlife and the environment.